The Real Champions: Why D1 Doesn’t have the Only Powerhouses in College Track and Field
In Division I men’s track and field, one team consistently stands at the forefront of national titles: the Florida Gators. Their dominance is undeniable, with an astounding seven outdoor championships over the past 12 years, including a recent three-peat in 2024. Yet, their road to victory often involves calculated moves, prioritizing the national meet over regional competitions, and focusing on a specific set of events. But what if the best team isn’t necessarily the one winning the national title? This question sparked a unique analysis, comparing Florida’s Division I roster to champions from other NCAA divisions and even the NAIA. The results might surprise you.
The Florida Gators’ Winning Formula
The Gators have mastered a “niche dominance” strategy, concentrating their efforts on sprint and jump events to secure national titles. In 2024, they won by just one point against Auburn, with a final score of 41-40. Interestingly, they don’t aim for first place in conference championships; instead, they focus on national success, with their highest SEC Conference finish during this three-peat being fourth place. It’s clear the Florida head coach knows the formula to win on a national scale, even if it means sacrificing conference victories.
A New Perspective: Division III vs. Division I
As a track and field enthusiast, I wanted to know: how would the Gators fare against other division champions? My curiosity led me to create a virtual dual meet between Florida and the Division III national champions, the MIT Engineers. Although MIT competes in Division III, the results were closer than expected; Florida only won by 12 points. This narrow margin hints that the gap between Division I and non-Division I athletes may not be as large as often assumed. This experiment also underscored a broader issue: the current NCAA championship system might not reveal the best all-around team.
The “Hack” in College Track and Field
Florida’s ability to win national titles is impressive, but it also highlights a flaw in the championship format. At conference meets, teams bring their entire rosters to compete across 21 events, forcing them to show depth and versatility. National championships, however, allow only the top athletes from each division, often resulting in fewer events and lower point totals.
This system benefits teams like Florida, whose national-level athletes specialize in a select few events. At a national meet, these athletes dominate their categories, even if the overall team lacks depth in other areas, creating a skewed view of which team is truly the best.
Creating a True Team Championship
To address this disparity, I designed a virtual meet where the season’s top performances for every athlete across four national champion teams (Florida for Division I, Pittsburgh State for Division II, University of Wisconsin–La Crosse for Division III, and Cumberland University for NAIA) were scored in all 21 events. This meet format aimed to determine the real “national champion” without the constraints of divisional boundaries.
Here’s a breakdown of each team:
Florida Gators (Division I) – Representing the powerhouse SEC, Florida has thrived in the 400m, 800m, long jump, shot put, discus, and relays, as long as they avoid mistakes, particularly in the 4x100m.
Pittsburgh State Gorillas (Division II) – This team claimed gold in the 110m hurdles, high jump, pole vault, and decathlon, showcasing a well-rounded strength across track and field.
University of Wisconsin–La Crosse Eagles (Division III) – Famous for Sam Blaskowski, who competed in the 2024 Olympic Trials, UW-La Crosse swept the 400m hurdles and 3K steeplechase, excelling in distance events where Florida is lighter.
Cumberland Patriots (NAIA) – While their strengths lie in the 1500m and longer distances, Cumberland also contended in the 5K and 10K, even though they generally had less competitive depth.
The Key Battles in Each Event
Several events turned into exciting showdowns, revealing the strengths and weaknesses of each team:
• 100m Dash: Florida’s Wanya McCoy narrowly defeated UW-La Crosse’s Blaskowski, running 10.02 to Blaskowski’s 10.09, with Pitt State in close pursuit.
• Triple Jump: Florida and Pitt State exchanged the lead, with Florida eventually winning this intense back-and-forth.
• Hammer Throw: This event brought in points for all three NCAA teams, with Pitt State taking first, UW-La Crosse second, and Florida third.
• Javelin: Another heated contest where Pitt State edged out Florida by a single point, further emphasizing the narrow margin between divisions.
Final Results: A New Champion Emerges
After tallying the scores, the final standings provided an unexpected twist:
Pittsburgh State Gorillas (Division II) – 252 points
Florida Gators (Division I) – 248 points
University of Wisconsin–La Crosse Eagles (Division III) – 188 points
Cumberland Patriots (NAIA) – 104 points
Pitt State emerged as the top-scoring team, dethroning Florida in this hypothetical meet and challenging the notion that only Division I teams can dominate on the national stage. With their all-around depth and strength across events, Pitt State’s Division II team proved it could hold its own against the best Division I has to offer.
What This Means for College Track and Field
These results show that even powerhouse Division I teams like Florida aren’t guaranteed to beat lower-division champions in a true team competition. Depth, versatility, and all-around strength across all events make a true team, not just a handful of elite athletes.
As college track and field looks to the future, this experiment raises an important question: should the NCAA consider a system that better reflects overall team strength? A multi-divisional championship could offer a more comprehensive and fair way to crown the best team in the nation, one that transcends division boundaries and gives every team a chance to compete on equal footing.
Conclusion
The Florida Gators might have mastered the current system, but the real champions aren’t always the ones standing on the highest podium. The Gorillas, Eagles, and Patriots proved that college track and field’s strength is broader than Division I. As the sport evolves, perhaps it’s time for the NCAA to recognize that the best team is the one that can excel across all 21 events, no matter the division.
LOOK GOOD, FEEL GOOD, RUN GOOD.
Shop for SCA apparel to express yourself, because “FAST IS A LIFESTYLE”.